what i do · applied ai, data, and software
Built plainly, documented, handed over
Most of what I take on starts as a workflow that has outgrown its spreadsheet. The technical half is the easier half. The other half is understanding how the decision actually gets made and where a tool can quietly remove friction.
The scope
The scope
AI and data tools
Recommendation systems, decision-support workflows, and analytics that answer a question someone actually asks. Where a model is involved, a person stays accountable for the decision and the reasoning is legible.
Dashboards and reporting
Reporting views an owner can read without a translator. Built on the numbers that drive a decision, not every number the system happens to store.
Custom applications
Booking flows, intake, client communication, internal tools. Built plainly, on a stack that will still make sense to whoever picks it up next.
Scoping and strategy
Sometimes the answer is that you do not need software yet. Watching how the work actually moves through a business comes before automating any of it.
What I turn down
What I turn down
- Work where you would not own the result. The source, the data, and the docs go with you.
- Automating a process nobody has fixed yet. That makes a broken process faster, not better.
- A model where a rule would do. If deterministic code can make the call, it should.
- Numbers I cannot source. No invented metrics, on this site or in a deliverable.
source: the standards carried over from enterprise internal-systems work
Next
If that sounds like the shape of your problem, the next step is a conversation about the workflow, not a proposal about the software.
Start a project